dqnews.com
Remark:
I don't think our friend from Rancho Bernado is paying attention......
By Roger Showley
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
February 15, 2007
DataQuick Information Systems, the San Diego company that collects information on home sales in nearly all markets across the country, has adjusted the way it computes its widely watched reports on median home prices.
The result will be revised calculations for housing prices and sales volume in all markets surveyed by DataQuick – including San Diego – going back to 1988, said DataQuick analyst John Karevoll.
Karevoll said the revisions should not greatly change previously reported price figures, which are closely followed by the real estate industry, as well as by homeowners, and are published in many newspapers. The changes will be less noticeable for prices that have been reported for individual ZIP codes.
Starting with January's DataQuick reports – released yesterday for Southern California – the new methodology will capture about 10 percent more transactions than previously reported.
The firm previously computed median prices for states, regions and counties based on a weighted average of medians first calculated for each ZIP code within the category.
Under the new system, the overall median for each geographic area will be calculated from all transactions within each group and not derived from a median price established for each ZIP code.
“For commercial uses we've been doing this methodology for three or four years,” Karevoll said. “What we'd like to do is get numbers put out in the public domain that are in sync with what we sell to banks.”
Going back to 1988, the change is relatively slight, with some areas a little higher than previously reported and others a little lower. Individual ZIP code prices remain unchanged unless additional transactions with known prices have been added since the initial reports.
In San Diego County, last year's overall median originally was reported at $490,000, down from $494,000 in 2005. The new calculations placed both figures at $500,000, meaning there was no change between the two years.
With the new methodology, last year still marked the first time since 1995 that there was not been a year-over-year increase in prices locally.
For single-family resale houses, which make up about half of all transactions, the original median reported $549,000 for 2005 and $554,000 for 2006. The revised numbers are $555,000 for both years.
The condominium resale medians in 2005 and 2006 originally were set at $392,000 and $390,000, respectively. In the new calculation only the 2005 figure changed, to $395,000.
The median for new homes – houses, condos and condo conversions – originally was set at $476,000 in 2005 and $444,000 in 2006. The revised figures were adjusted down to $473,5000 and $439,500, respectively.
Karevoll said there continues to be a gap in information reported at the ZIP code level.
Now the number of sales reported by the firm reflects all transactions, whether the price is known or not. The median price is necessarily based only on the properties for which there is a known price. The median is the midway point among all sales, with half above and half below that level. In a few cases, the location of the home also is not known by DataQuick, so the ZIP code of the mailing address for the property tax bill is assumed to be the site of the home.
If a transaction involves more than one home, Karevoll said each home will be counted separately. Transfers of homes in intrafamily transactions and apartment sales will continue to be excluded.
To illustrate one effect of the revision, the company had reported under the old system that housing sales in 2006 for San Diego County amounted to 42,122. Using the new method, the figure was revised to 44,580.
DataQuick says its sales information represents about 90 percent of the dollar volume of all real estate activity nationally and 95 percent of all activity in metropolitan areas like San Diego.
Remarks:
Desperate times call for desperate measures. Looks like they may buy themselves a few more months before the year-over-year go negative. What a scam...................
(Click to enlarge)
Remarks:
A few examples of Rancho Bernardo home owners who are below the curve on timing the real estate market (some as much as $230K). Some homes are actually listing under 2004 prices. I am sure these set of owners will not be the last to be on this prestigious list.
Listing Info:
By Lauren Baier Kim, Wall Street Journal
New data released by the Census Bureau shows that the vacancy rate of homes for sale, at 2.7%, or 2.1 million vacant homes, is at its highest level since the bureau began tracking it 40 years ago, according to a Wall Street Journal Online article. These properties, many of which are likely held by investors, could bring housing values down further as prices are slashed to attract buyers, WSJ Online says. Meanwhile, CNNMoney.com reports that figures released by Case Shiller Weiss indicate that nearly every major housing market in the U.S. has seen price declines in November. Showing the largest year-over-year price declines that month were Boston, with a 5% dip, and Detroit, with a 4.5% drop, CNNMoney says. The biggest year-over-year price increases were in Seattle (13%), Portland (11.6%) and Miami (7.4%), according to the article, which includes a chart summarizing market trends for 20 U.S. cities.
Listing Information:
The New York Times
House flipping in California last year declined to its lowest level since 2003 as speculators retreated from a market in which sales plunged and prices flattened, a market tracker said recently.
Properties owned for six months or less accounted for just 3.2 percent of resales last year, down from 4.2 percent in 2005 and 3.6 percent in 2004, according to the San Juan Capistrano-based HomeSmartReports.com.
Overall, flippers sold the properties for a median $45,000 more than they paid, somewhat lower than $52,000 in 2005. If there were improvement costs, profit would be correspondingly lower.
In 2003, when HomeSmart-Reports.com began tracking flipping, the practice of buying and then quickly selling a property, it accounted for 2.4 percent of resales.
The company tracked public records and considered a property flipped if it was owned for six months or less.
In Los Angeles County, flipping accounted for 3.6 percent of sales last year, versus 4.4 percent in 2005.
This level of activity is not surprising because sales last year were well under the 2005 level. Prices, though, have not plunged because the economy is still growing, albeit at a modest pace.
“What’s happened now is the flipping activity is just reflective of today’s real estate climate,” said Steve Morgan, the company’s senior vice president.
“Investors, if they can, have adopted a buy-and-hold strategy until prices come back up.”
And if prices don’t start rising some owners will be forced to sell and cut their losses, he said.
Flipping was highest in Kern (4.7 percent) and Riverside (4.3 percent) counties last year, and lowest in Napa County (1.9 percent) and in rural Sierra foothill counties (2 percent).
Listing Information (click to enlarge):
Listing Details: (click to enlarge)
Listing Details (click to enlarge):
Click on link above or on picture to enlarge
Listing Information (click to enlarge):
