Tuesday, October 17, 2006

My Flipping Investment


3552 OTTAWA AVE, CLAIREMONT


This beautiful 3500 sq ft, 4 Br, 4 Ba home was built in July 2006. It has all the modern conveniences and entails a luxurious lifestyle.

This home was listed on the market on 9/19/2006 (27 days ago) for $1,150,000. Well you may think it may be a bit overpriced and darn it, you want to know why?

Lets go back to 2005 when this mighty home was a mere shadow of itself at 806 sq ft, 2Br and 1 Ba.

Yes, that's right the investor/flipper purchased the home in June 2005 for $475K and repackaged it into this mini-mansion in a year.

I am not a homebuilder, but many of my friends state that building a home generally costs between $150-$200 sq ft depending on the quality and workmanship. At 3500 sq ft you can assume that he may have spent anywhere from $525-700K to rebuild the home.

A purchase price of $475K plus the bulding costs ($525-700K) puts us at $1,000,000-1,175,000.

It looks as if this investor may have not thought this one through.

Am I off here? Any builders out there?


Monday, October 16, 2006

To Flip or not to flip? That is the question.


513 Beach St in Encinitas was purchased in April 2005 for $632,670. It was listed back on the market on 10/6/2006 for $690,000.

According to Data Quick the median price of a home in this area from year to year is -24%. If that is the case the house should sell for $524K.


I think $524K is still expensive for a 1720 sq ft home ($304 psf) with $250 /per month HOA/MR. I would put this home on my list at $375-425K.
As it stands today, with a full offer, the seller would break even or barely come out ahead. However, this is simply another example of "greed gone wild".
To the eventual buyer of this home, I have one question for you. Do you think this home will increase or decrease in value in the next 5 years?
The answer is already in front of you.




Screw the house, lets flip land.


This 0.69 acre parcel on HUBBARD PL in Escondido was purchased on 10/24/2004 for $111,869 . The parcel was listed on the market on 9/12/2006 (29 days ago) for $249,000.
Here is what the realtors had to say:
"Steep lot yet grading plans where drawn for a house pad verses grading for a split level home. Grading plans are available for viewing with the owner/agent. "
So no real improvements have been made on this lot yet it has doubled in value. Plus, the bulk of the costs are yet to come.
Is the cost due to a housing shortage? Land shortage? I can't explain it.

Sunday, October 15, 2006

San Diego County Foreclosure Tracker

All San Diego County (2815)

North County Coastal (353 listings)
Cardiff by the Sea (5 listings)
Carlsbad (62 listings)
Carmel Valley (28 listings)
Del Mar (15 listings)
Encinitas (20 listings)
Oceanside (212 listings)
Rancho Santa Fe (4 listings)
Santa Luz (2 listings)
Solana Beach (7 listings)

Central Coastal (106 listings)
Bay Park (15 listings)
Coronado (6 listings)
La Jolla (22 listings)
Ocean Beach (11 listings)
Pacific Beach (25 listings)
Point Loma (11 listings)
University City (16 listings)

Central Inland (580 listings)
Clairemont (33 listings)
College Area (44 listings)
Del Cerro (18 listings)
Downtown San Diego (25 listings)
East San Diego (44 listings)
Encanto (116 listings)
Linda Vista (27 listings)
Logan Heights (60 listings)
Mission Hills (25 listings)
Mission Valley (44 listings)
Normal Heights (25 listings)
North Park (35 listings)
San Carlos (28 listings)
San Diego (34 listings)
Sorrento Valley (5 listings)
Tierrasanta (17 listings)

North County Inland (685 listings)
Bonsall (5 listings)
Escondido (141 listings)
Fallbrook (52 listings)
Julian (7 listings)
Mira Mesa (61 listings)
Pala (2 listings)
Pauma Valley (2 listings)
Poway (30 listings)
Ramona (42 listings)
Rancho Bernardo (60 listings)
Rancho Penasquitos (37 listings)
San Marcos (77 listings)
Scripps Ranch (23 listings)
Valley Center (28 listings)
Vista (115 listings)
Warner Springs (3 listings)

East County (510 listings)
Alpine (13 listings)
Boulevard (3 listings)
Campo (9 listings)
Descanso (2 listings)
El Cajon (161 listings)
Jacumba (2 listings)
Jamul (14 listings)
La Mesa (47 listings)
Lakeside (53 listings)
Lemon Grove (43 listings)
Pine Valley (3 listings)
Potrero (1 listing)
Santee (47 listings)
Spring Valley (112 listings)

South County (581 listings)
Bonita (25 listings)
Chula Vista (334 listings)
Imperial Beach (11 listings)
National City (56 listings)
Otay Mesa (73 listings)
Paradise Hills (54 listings)
San Ysidro (28 listings)

How can you justify this?


I am a believer in supply and demand and in sensible economics however it is mind boggling to me to see how sellers price their home after 5 or 6 years of "ownership" . Take 6632 MAYCREST LANE in SORRENTO. The seller purchased this home on 3/30/2000 for $414,500 and listed on the market on 5/1/2006 for $1,150,000.


Is this a flip? That is irrelavent, was is important here is do you believe this home has legitamately tripled in value in the last 6 years. Has your salary tripled in 6 years, has the population tripled? Is there a housing shortage? The answers to the above is certainly NO. So how do you justify it?


The answer: you can't.

Thursday, October 12, 2006

Home Price Drop Largest in 13 Years


The median home price in San Diego County dropped by $22,000 from the previous year, driven down primarily by slashed prices for new homes. The end to the trend is nowhere in sight, some experts say.


By KELLY BENNETT Voice Staff Writer (Voice of San Diego)


Thursday, Oct. 12, 2006 The overall median home price in the county in September was $22,000 lower than it was last year, dropping 4.42 percent to $476,000, DataQuick Information Systems reported Wednesday.The drop was the biggest dollar-amount plunge observed year-on-year by DataQuick since it started monitoring the San Diego market in 1988.The figures didn't come as a surprise to local analysts.


The median price first dipped negative year-on-year in June, one of the first tangible signs the booming housing market was quieting. Even before then, reports of slowing in residential construction staffing and projects, slumping sales rates, soaring unsold inventory levels, spikes in foreclosures and the popularity of risky mortgages had market observers waiting for the median price to catch up with the anecdotal evidence.


Some say the market's going to turn around again soon -- but others say the end's nowhere in sight."It is a big drop," said Peter Dennehy, vice president of the Sullivan Group Realty Advisors, of the median price change. "But sales prices have even come down more than that. The median price is finally coming starting to come down with what we're seeing on the street."


Andrew LePage of DataQuick said that based on the data, San Diego is "still in soft landing territory.""This market ran up for seven-plus years," he said. "We're going to see it wobble around a bit no matter what."The next couple of months will likely hold even bigger year-over-year declines, LePage said. Prices were still rising in the fall of 2005, reaching a peak of $518,000 in November.


Comparing this year's numbers to last year's would look like a hairpin -- as they were trending up last year, the current numbers are trending down now.This year, the September median price logged a 1.24-percent price drop from the price recorded for August.Both LePage and economist Chris Thornberg of Beacon Economics said it's misleading to look just at the overall median price, because the only section of the market seeing a dramatic slowdown is new homes.


The condo and detached home resale markets saw just 0.8 percent and 0.9 percent declines from last September, respectively. Those contrast sharply with the median price in the new home market, which took a 16.9 percent dive to $414,000 from last year's $498,000."You've got to be really cautious," Thornberg said. "The price of new homes is really driving down your overall median. You don't know if the quality changed or what."But sales activity slowed considerably last month, with home sales overall dropping 35.7 percent from the rate of sales recorded in September 2005.


Broken into market categories, the declines measured year-on-year declines of 41.2 percent in the condo resale market, 30.7 percent in the detached resale market and 37.5 percent for new homes.University of San Diego economist Alan Gin has forecasted a slowdown in the local economy for the end of this year and the beginning of 2007, and the weakening housing market plays into that. So does the employment rate, which could take a big hit if the housing market continues on the path it's on, Gin said."To me, the more serious aspect is the slowing of activity," he said. "


Fewer sales, fewer commissions, fewer loans -- that will result in job loss in those industries."Real estate advisor Gary London of The London Group said he saw the new data as "a relatively mild price slippage.""This is a very minor amount of money relative to the price inflation experience we've had over the entire decade," he said, referring to the median price increase of more than 200 percent between 2000 and 2005.


London pointed out that the data being released now reflects a smaller section of the market -- the "need-to-sell subgroup," he calls it -- that doesn't represent as many people or types of homes which would have been turning over a year ago."I'm not an apologist for this industry at all," he said, "but I don't see this as a disturbing thing."Neither does San Diego Association of Realtors president Charles Jolly, who hailed the DataQuick release as "great news for buyers."


The increased inventory and dropping prices are two indicators of San Diego's becoming a "buyer's market," he said.Jolly contends that home buyers who purchased a home, even near the end of the boom, with the intent and financial ability to hold onto it for at least five years, shouldn't be affected too dramatically by these value fluctuations."


In the long term, it will go up," he said. But Thornberg said the market will have to navigate some more tough terrain ahead."


All this nonsense about us already starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel, we're not even close," he said.


You have to love Thornberg!-Bob


Flipper Tests Market and Fails


1213 EAST LANE, IMPERIAL BEACH
This flipper tried to pull a quicky on some sucker when he listed this home for sale on 7/15/2006 for $950,000 only 20 short months after purchasing it for $740, 000 in November 2004. Well 88 days have passed and this flipper has lowered his asking price to $799,000-$850,000.
This flippers hair has grown too long and it's time for another $100K "hair cut" to $699-750K. If I were him, I would get on my knees and pray I break even on this one.

Mortgage 101: Interest Only Loans

How the flippers got rich and how the buyers became fools.

This video sums up everything you need to know about interest only loans and why you should stay away from them. If you can't afford to by a home using a conventional 30-year mortgage then just rent. You are better off in the longterm.


Same old tune in El Cajon


9553 CHIMNEY ROCK, EL CAJON
This flipper purchased this 4 Br, 3 Ba 2203 sq ft home on 3/24/2006 for $670,000. He turned around and put the home for sale on 8/15/2006 after less than 5 months of "home ownership". The original asking price was $680,000 and has been lowered to $640,000. This flipper is going to get a $70,000 "hair cut" even if he gets a full offer (which is doubtful).
I estimate this house in the $500-550K range max in todays market, and $375K by Summer 2008.

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

A Humbling Lesson for Realtors' President


How ironic, a great story about this home belonging to Thomas M. Stevens, president of the National Association of Realtors, that has been on the market for about a year from the Washington Post...........

He, of all people, should have known better.

The president of the National Association of Realtors, Thomas M. Stevens of Vienna, admits he didn't follow his agents' advice when the real estate market started to cool. That, he says, is why his old house in Great Falls has now been on the market for a year at the price of $1.45 million.
"What I should have done," confessed the senior vice president of NRT Inc., parent of Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage, "was listened to my agent and cut the price by $50,000 to $100,000 early on, and the property would have sold last October."
Or, even better, he said, "I should have listed it a month earlier," when the market was only just beginning to lose air.

Now Stevens, like so many other home sellers in the Washington area and around the nation, is waiting for a buyer in a market that has totally reversed course since a year ago. With two or three times the number of properties listed this year as last in some neighborhoods, agents are urging sellers to lower their expectations, put on their best face and offer incentives such as closing cost help.

Stevens does have a better excuse than most for not paying attention. He's been on the road most of the year as head of the 1.3 million-member real estate organization, the nation's largest trade group. And when he's at his current home in Vienna, "I've been downtown lobbying."

He and his wife, Lindy, were also preoccupied in the past few years with remodeling the home they now live in, a 100-year-old farmhouse called Windover House. They bought that property in 2001 for $1.3 million. It's now assessed at almost $2.8 million, a testament to the hot market.

The Great Falls Colonial that's for sale was the Stevenses' previous house on Woodleaf Lane, their first home after they married. They bought the two acres of land in 1979 for $49,500, and took out what now sounds like a high-interest construction loan. Stevens remembers how unnerving those days were: "Rates went all the way to 19 percent, and my wife said we would not be able to afford to buy. . . . But we grabbed a 12-and-a-half percent loan and we thought we had struck gold."

Stevens said that when he set the price for the four-bedroom, 3 1/2 -bath Great Falls property, his agents, Gail and Terry Belt of Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage in Vienna, warned him that he might be high. And they have continued to remind him about the shifting market.

"They sent the letter telling me the listing was approaching a year" and that the price needed another look, he said. "They're doing their job as agents. I'm not doing my job as a seller."

But, he noted, in his defense: "Who knew last September how long this down trend was going to continue," after so many years of climbing upward?

When asked how long sellers should expect a sale to take these days, Stevens said 40 to 60 days would be typical. And if a house hasn't moved by then, he said, "You need to adjust the price. . . . But I didn't do that. And my house is still on the market."
Awesome.......lesson learned

Chula Vista Nightmare

I recently recieved an email from Ben G. who wanted to expose a "flip gone bad" in Chula Vista.

1411 CAMINITO BORREGO UNIT#6, CHULA VISTA




These townhomes went on the market in 2002. Unit #6 is approximately 1,141 sq. ft. Two bedrooms, two baths, deck and attached one-car garage.

As I mentioned before, these homes sold in 2002 and were priced from the high $100,000s. In fact I pulled the brochure from the Union Tribune website:





This townhouse was sold on 5/25/2005 for $425,000 and was placed for sale by the current owner on 10/10/2006 for $350,000-$369,000.

The current owner evidently took out a 100% financed loan, because her agent listed it as a short sale.

The owner, lender and neighbors stand to take a huge hit here, a 13-18% hit in 18 months to be exact. This is unfortunate, however the story must be told to protect future buyers from these flippers.

Thanks Ben.

Affordable homes in Chula Vista?

The City of Chula Vista and Trimark Pacific Homes are making it possible for 1st - time buyers who meet certain criteria to purchase a new townhome in the San Miguel Ranch community of Chula Vista . In order to participate in this unique opportunity, all buyers must meet specific guidelines and requirements and be subject to ownership restriction during the period of ownership. Here is a brief overview of the qualifications for this program:


*You must be a first-time homebuyer. This means you have not had any interest in any real estate in the last 3 years.


*Your total gross household income for all family members (before taxes) must not exceed the following limits based on family size:

1-person--$38,650
2-people--$44,150
3-people--$49,700
4-people--$55,200
5-people--$59,600
6-people--$64,050
7-people--$68,450

*You must earn enough to meet the minimum qualifying income for the size townhome you are purchasing. No non-occupant co-borrowers will be allowed.


*You must have enough cash to provide the minimum down payment and closing costs for the size townhome you are purchasing.


*Your total liquid assets after you move in may not exceed $25,000.


*You must occupy the property as your principle place of residence for the entire duration of ownership.


*When you sell your townhome, you will be subject to resale restrictions.


You may think with all these restrictions you may actually get a good deal here right? Wrong, these townhomes start at $350-410K. That means your house payments are going to be in the $1750-$2100 range at the current interest rates.
I am sure a 2 person family making $44k ($30K after taxes, medical, etc) can afford $1800 per month, plus HOA's, plus bills.
Thank God for those $0.99 cent deals at Taco Bell.

Tuesday, October 10, 2006

Best and worst values in San Marcos

It's time again to pick out a random community and select the best and worst values. This week we chose San Marcos. San Marcos is a fast growing community in North San Diego County. There have been many new homes built there since 2000, so it makes it a prime location for flippers.

Today, instead of focusing on flipper activity, lets determining the best an worst values when we consider factors such as price/sq ft. In this area you would usually find many homes in the 2000-3000 sq ft range selling for $550-750K. IMHO, areas like San Marcos, Carlsbad & Rancho Bernardo fueled the housing bubble and unfortunately (or fortunately) will ultimately see the largest decline.

The worst value in San Marcos:




663 LA SIERRA DR, SAN MARCOS


This is a 870 sq ft home built in 1975 consisting of 3 Br and 1 Ba on a 7200 sq ft lot. The owner is currently asking between $470,000-$490,000. That basically means you would pay approximately $540-$563/sq ft.
Since this home is not located on the sand nor has any special qualities (such as an oil filed or a diamond mine in the back yard) you would be best served avoiding this pricey home.

The best value in San Marcos:



362 EDGEWATER DR, SAN MARCOS


Since "best value" is inherently a subjective term I submit this 3174 sq ft home built in 2004 consisting of 5 Br, 4 Ba on a 9350 sq ft lot. Even though the owner is asking $589,900-$639,900, or approximately $186-$202/sq ft, the home is at the low end of similar homes. The one draw back (and a deal breaker for me) is the $380 per month HOAs and Mello-Roos (that is a car payment on a BMW for the next 30 years).

So there you have it folks, some descent examples in the city of San Marcos.

Regulation of risky mortgages long overdue

Finally, there are some folks that believe for you to qualify for a 100% financed loan of $750,000 you should not make less than $30K a year.....what a revelation!

This article from Inman news is interesting.....

By Marcie Geffner

Federal regulators recently suggested new guidelines for banks that originate certain types of high-risk mortgages. The banks, predictably, were not enthusiastic about the regulators' suggestions. But the regulators have it right: It's high time for banks to limit access to these mortgages and disclose the real risks to borrowers.

The suggested guidelines would require banks to qualify borrowers for financing on the basis of fully indexed interest rates for interest-only and payment-option loans and to consider the borrower's ability to repay not only the original loan amount, but also any additional principal that may result if interest-only or minimum payments are made.

Banks have objected that these guidelines would limit the number of people who can qualify for these loans. That's true and it's exactly the point. The borrower's ability to repay the loan should be a basic component of loan underwriting and to ignore it defies common sense. A borrower's ability to manage no more than just the interest-only or minimum payments should disqualify him or her from this type of loan since the payments will escalate when the loan is recast.

Reasonable guidelines will not keep everyone from obtaining these loans, but rather the loans will be reserved for those borrowers who have the ability to manage and repay the debt.

Banks also have suggested that borrowers may be frightened by disclosures that reveal how much higher their monthly payments would be in certain circumstances. Again, that's exactly the point: Borrowers who are frightened off by those higher payments shouldn't have these types of loans. Most home buyers naturally experience some anxiety about the financial commitment, but it's irresponsible to help people buy a home they are truly frightened they won't be able to afford.

Banks also have argued that the suggested disclosures should be required of all lenders, not just federally insured institutions. That's a good point too -- and a compelling argument for more regulation, not less. Once federal regulators set appropriate standards, state regulators can and should follow that lead. Some state-level regulatory groups already have signaled an intention to do so.

Interest-only and minimum-payment loans have helped many people purchase homes, but who benefits if those homeowners can't afford the higher payments and the property ends up in foreclosure? The homeowners lose while the lenders and mortgage brokers make out like proverbial bandits. The brokers have collected their commissions; the lenders have sold the loans, and the investors who purchased them are protected by mortgage insurance, which is, of course, paid for by the homeowners.

Interest-only and payment-option loans were supposed to be intended for sophisticated borrowers who could take advantage of the greater flexibility. The fact that so many of these loans were sold to people for whom they weren't intended begs an obvious yet important question: Why didn't regulators insist on tougher guidelines a long time ago?

It's equally easy to point an accusatory finger at supposedly greedy mortgage brokers, but neither the regulators nor the brokers are solely responsible. After all, the lenders created these loans and set up the compensation systems that rewardbrokers who push borrowers into these riskiest of mortgages.

It's fair to argue as well that some of the blame lies with the borrowers. Willful ignorance, irresponsible decisions, house envy, an insatiable desire for immediate gratification, blind trust and a sign-it-now-and-read-it-later-if-ever mentality have been magnified to an astounding degree and aren't a smart way to borrow hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Since those borrower frailties are apt to undo the benefits of additional disclosures, tighter underwriting guidelines are crucial. Those who are able to qualify will be able to obtain these loan products while those who can't, won't. It's really that simple, and the regulators, lenders, brokers and borrowers should make it happen. To mix a few metaphors, it's time for everyone to step up to the plate, be the first line of defense and get the responsibility ball rolling because it's the right thing to do.

Monday, October 09, 2006

Flipper can't hideaway in Scripps Ranch



12918 HIDEAWAY LANE, SCRIPPS RANCH

This house was purchase on 11/9/2005 for a cool $1,000,000. It is a 5 Br, 4.5 Ba, 3563 sq ft, mini-castle.

This flipper quickly listed his home for sale less than 5 months later on 4/10/2006 for $1,099,000.

Even if he recieved a full offer he would barely be making a profit, certainly not enough profit to chance it in a buyers market. Well, more than 6 months have past and while he has reduced his asking price to $949,000-$999,000 there is just no motivation for a buyer to take on such a huge mortgage payment.

This home and many others in this area are well on their way down this slippery slope we call the biggest price correction in the history of California.

Great Deal For 1st-time home buyers




2616 MEADE AVE, NORMAL HEIGHTS
Hurry up folks we have a great deal for you, but act fast because this listing will not last!
2Br, 2Ba, 983 sq ft, built in 1934, sitting on a spacious 2500 sq ft lot.....
I'll just let the realtor do the talking, because I'm just so excited....
"GREAT OPPORTUNITY!! FOR INVESTOR OR 1ST TIME BUYER. COSMETIC FIXER WITH GREAT OPEN FLOOR PLAN. NICE WOOD FLOORS. TAX RECORDS SHOW JUST UNDER 1000 BUT SELLERS STATE OVER 1000 ESTIMATED SQR. FT. AND FEELS LARGER. NEEDS UPDATING AND HAVE A GREAT HOME. SELLER MOTIVATED FOR A QUICK SALE. NICE SPANISH COTTAGE LOOK. 24HR NOTICE "

All this for a low price of $549,900-$599,900


I can't wait until my realtor takes me on a tour of this home, even though it is on the high end of my range, I'm sure I can talk my wife and kids into living in this beauty.






Mission Valley Flippers Frustrated


8355 STATION VILLAGE LANE, MISSION VALLEY


These flippers purchased these 5 units last year and attempted to pull a fast one on the general public.


Unit # 4304

2 br, 2 ba 1171 sq ft, purchased for $481,267 on 6/21/2005, listed on 8/31/2006 for $430,000-$485,876


Unit # 4104

2 br, 2 ba 1171 sq ft, purchased for $402,713 on 6/24/2005, listed on 8/3/2006 for $549,000 has now been reduced to $512,999-$524,999


Unit # 4218
2 br, 2 ba 1171 sq ft, purchased for $516,769 on 6/24/2005, listed on 9/5/2006 for $517,000-$535,000


Unit # 4309
2 br, 2 ba 1176 sq ft, purchased for $485,738 on 6/20/2005, listed on 9/6/2006 for $539,900 has now been reduced to $525,000


Unit # 4203

2 br, 2 ba 1179 sq ft, purchased for $507,999 on 6/15/2005, listed on 3/28/2006 for $610,000 has now been reduced to $529,999


All of these flippers will be lucky to break even. What ever happened to earning money the old fashioned way with screwing innocent folks who just want a place to live without pay 80% of their take home salary.


Folks, the blog is for your education spread the word and stop this outrageous behavior. We must make a stand and take back our county.......together.





Sunday, October 08, 2006

How fast can you flip a house?


9286 OLYMPUS COURT, MIRA MESA
This flpper purchased this house less than a month ago on 9/15/2006 for $663,900. He listed it on the market the next freak'in day on 9/16/2006 for $699,000-$765,000. I am shocked that there are flippers out there that still believe that they can get away with this, and I can't believe that there are buyers out there that help them achieve their goals.
Spread the world we are not going to put up with this anymore.

**Flipper Alert**Flipper Alert**Flipper Alert**


452 CORNWALL, ESCONDIDO

This flipper has 2 other flippers on the same street to compete with, 412, and 423 Cornwall, respectively. Even though his house has a smaller living area, 1995 vs 2158 sq ft, he aggressively put his home on the market for $539K after only 8 months after purchasing it for $465,990. Currently, it is listed for $529K and has been on the market for 50 days.


Lets look at his competition:
412 Cornwall, 2158 sq ft, purchased for $501,989 on 12/2005, asking $499,900-$529,900, on the market for 35 days.
423 Cornwall, 2158 sq ft, purchased for $506,604 on 12/2005, asking $499,900-$529,900, on the market for 27 days.
What do you think? My inclination is that all of these flippers will be very luck to sell in the $425-450K range. IMHO, if Iwere looking to buy in this area, I would definately hold out until they reach $275-375K, hopefully by Spring 2008.

Saturday, October 07, 2006

Oceanside Market Corroding for this Flipper


4306 MORGAN CREEK WAY, OCEANSIDE
This home has been flipped more than than a low-rider cutting you off on the 805. Originally purchased on 3/03/2003 for $462,000, the orginal flipper made a quick get-a-way by unloading this box for $750,000 on 9/1/2005. Wow! The latest flipper put the house on the market 10 months later on 7/31/2006 for $755,000, hoping to salvage what is turning out to be a complete disaster. On the market now for over 2 months this flipper has reduced his asking price to $649,000-$695,000. Even if he sells it at $695K. asumming 6% for commisson fees and closing costs he is already in the hole 100K in just 1 year.
People, people, people.....watch and learn. This is why this blog exists.

Friday, October 06, 2006

Flipper vs Flipper in Point Loma
















2718 E. BAINBRIDGE, POINT LOMA

Intially purchased on 6/3/ 2004 for $658,500 this flipper put his home for sale on 2/27/06 for $995,000. Yes, that is about a $340K profit in 20 months. The home is still on the market however, it is now priced for $799,900-$829,900.

















2746 E. BAINBRIDGE, POINT LOMA

Intially purchased on 5/27/ 2004 for $688,000 this flipper put his home for sale on 3/14/06 for $1,050,000. Yes, that is about a $360K profit in 22 months. The home is still on the market however, it is now priced for $900,000-$1,000,876.

These two flippers are in a fierce fight to find the next dummy to try to dump their properties on. They figured that they would list their homes in Spring and make quick sales by the Summer to get their tax exemption. Not gonna happen, not now, not tomorrow. Try reducing your asking price to $450K-550k.

Spotlight Realtor: Dave Harlan

San Diego County Market Conditions

Dave Harlan, Realtor North County: 10/5/2006








San Marcos Market Condition:




"Here are some revealing statistics. San Marcos had 760 homes on the market this morning but only 60 homes sold in the last 30 days. This means about 9 out of 10 homes didn't sell. Wow! Where are all the buyers? "

Vista Market Condition:





"Here are some revealing statistics. Vista had 587 homes on the market this morning but only 62 homes sold in the last 30 days. This means about 9 out of 10 homes didn't sell. Wow! Where are all the buyers? "
Oceanside Market Condition:





"Here are some revealing statistics. Oceanside had 1470 homes on the market this morning but only 123 homes sold in the last 30 days. This means about 9 out of 10 homes didn't sell. Wow! Where are all the buyers? "


Escondido Market Condition:



"Here are some revealing statistics. Escondido had 1236 homes on the market this morning but only 115 homes sold in the last 30 days. This means about 9 out of 10 homes didn't sell. Wow! Where are all the buyers?"
So where are all the buyers Dave? There right here waiting for the greed and the foolishness to subside.

Thursday, October 05, 2006

**Flipper Alert**Flipper Alert**Flipper Alert**


3508 ROCK RIDGE ROAD, CARLSBAD, CA

This flipper purchased this home on 12/16/2005 for $682,990. He listed it for sale on 5/15/2006 (6 months later) for $849,000. One hundred forty three days later the price has been reduced to $769,000-$799,000.

It is amazing how these flippers operate. Did he really think in today's market you can swindle your way to a quick profit? Now he has his neighbors excited, watching every price reduction he make.

Stop this nonsense. In my opinion this house should sell for no more than $450K today and $375K by next summer and $325K by next Fall. Clock is ticking.

By the way, you're neighbors seem to have a nice view of your backyard, frontyard, bedrooms, kitchen.....ahh so much for privacy.

Short Sales Galore!

Flippers are in a world of trouble, rising interest rates, tighter lending standards, smarter buyers have these greedy people heading down a slippery slope........

1591 COUNTRY VISTAS LN, BONITA



Realtor: "SHORT SALE-Pre Foreclosure Upon BANK Approval! This homes sits in the ever so popular area in Bonita on COUNRTY VISTAS LANE, surrounded by million dollare homes.This property requires some updating and has been very well maintained.A little TLC on this home is all it requires! "


The price: $700K!...........Lady Please. For $700K the house better be in tip-top condition with 5 acres of land, a barn and 10 horses, otherwise, I'll submit an offer to the auctioneer for $250K.



822-824 N. 42ND. SAN DIEGO



Realtor: "GREAT OPPORTUNITY, SHORT SALE, Subject to Lender approval. Pride of Owner, homes have been remodel through out. Homes are well groom in and out. Detach 2 car garage with plenty of parking space around. GO SHOW!! "

The price: $470K........All that missing in this house is a bench press and a bunch of free weights in the front yard. I would pay $470K-350K( The cost it would take to take your girlfriend out for dinner for the next 30 years so she won't see what a dump you live in.) = $120K.

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

S.D. home price fall predicted at 8.5%

Finally, somebody willing to admit the obvious!

Moody's foresees a third of cities hit

By Mike FreemanUNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
October 4, 2006

With home sales slowing and inventories of unsold homes rising, a new report predicts that housing prices will fall in about a third of the metropolitan areas in the United States, including San Diego. But the forecast by Moody's Economy.com, a private research firm, doesn't predict a crash in housing prices in a vast majority of the nation's cities, including San Diego.

The report, released yesterday, projects prices for new and resale single-family homes to drop 8.5 percent in San Diego from the market peak at the end of 2005 to the first half of 2008, when the market is predicted to hit bottom.

Prices have already declined locally in the first and second quarters of this year, said Brian Carey, an economist with Economy.com who worked on the report.
Sellers, particularly new-home developers, have been cutting prices as homes have lingered on the market and buyer demand has slowed. “They do have a lot of excess supply right now,” Carey said of San Diego.

The region, however, wasn't among the cities where prices are forecast to decline the most. It ranked 37th in the report. Danville, Ill., was projected to see the biggest percentage drop in home prices at 18.7 percent. It was followed by Fort Myers, Fla.; Reno, Nev.; Merced and Stockton.

Condos were excluded from Economy.com's forecast because it lacked good data, Carey said.
In areas like San Diego, however, condos may be more vulnerable than single-family homes to steep price declines because of the unprecedented construction of new units downtown and elsewhere, as well as a glut of condo conversions either for sale today or planned in the near future.

“We realize the condo market could be hit harder,” Carey said.
Nathan Moeder, an analyst with San Diego real estate consultant The London Group, said it's not surprising that home prices would be falling now that buyers are being cautious.
But he doubted that any forecast could accurately predict how much prices might drop. That's because it's difficult to say what the future holds for interest rates, job growth and other factors that contribute to housing demand.

“We've already seen adjustments by developers, not only with incentives but also price decreases because they have to sell their units,” said Moeder. “But is it going to drop zero or 10 percent? Who knows? Moeder added that if Economy.com is correct, an 8.5 percent decline would not be significant for most homeowners given the sky-high appreciation in San Diego since 2000.

The median home value for San Diego homes, adjusted for inflation, rose to $567,000 from $249,000 between 2000 and 2005, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. It was the largest increase among the country's biggest cities.

“Think about how much equity and paper wealth has been created for these people over the last five years,” Moeder said. “So an 8 percent decrease is not a big deal.”
Nationwide, Economy.com projects that the median sales price for an existing home will decline in 2007 by 3.6 percent, which would be the first decline for an entire year in home prices since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

The report projected that 133 of the nation's 379 metropolitan areas would suffer price declines.
That is quite a contrast from the past five years when low mortgage rates pushed sales to five consecutive annual records, and prices in the hottest sales areas skyrocketed.
The forecast is included in a 195-page report, “Housing at the Tipping Point.”
Some analysts are worried that the slowdown could become so severe that it could drag the entire country into a recession, much like the bursting of the stock market bubble in 2000 led to the 2001 slump.

The 133 areas with slumping prices are concentrated in the states of California and Florida and the Northeast corridor from southern Maine to just south of Washington, D.C., as well as boom areas of Nevada and Arizona and some depressed sections of the Midwest, such as Detroit.
Of the areas with falling prices, 72 were forecast to hit their low point by the end of this year, with the rest seeing a trough for prices in 2007, 2008 or even as late as 2009.
But even in areas that have already hit a low point for prices, the rebound isn't expected to occur quickly.

“Prices are going to go down and stay down for a while. It will take at least a couple of years to work off the excesses of the last decade,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com and the principal author of the report.
The report described the current environment as a “correction” and not a “crash,” but it cautioned that there were downside risks that could make the slowdown more serious.
“We believe the housing downturn will weigh on the economic expansion, but will not break it . . . ” Zandi said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

A Quicky in Oceanside


Evidently there are some folks that still believe that they can turn a quick profit in this marketplace. Take the seller at 1049 BOULDER PLACE, OCEANSIDE, CA, he purchased this home on 7/21/06 for $663,222. On 8/26/06 he listed it on the market for $749,995. However, there are no takers at that price so the new asking price is $679,995-$729,995.
Well, who is the next greater fool? It won't be me, I'll tell you that.

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Not so pleasant on Pleasant Vale Drive, Carlsbad

Listing _________Sq Ft ____Price _________Listed On

3419 Pleasant Vale___2705 ____$795,990 _________8/25/2006
3423 Pleasant Vale___2597 ____$745,990 _________6/26/2006
3424 Pleasant Vale___2705 ____$759,990 _________8/15/2006

3495 Pleasant Vale___2705 ____$710,000-$729,900 __9/26/2006





3419 Pleasant Vale Dr is currently owned by the builder.

3423 Pleasant Vale Dr is currently owned by the builder.

3424 Pleasant Vale Dr is currently owned by the builder.

3495 Pleasant Vale Dr was purchased on 3/9/06 for $754,698. Seven months later and the seller is in the proverbial hole.

I love to see a flipper take one for the team and screw the builder at his own game. The lower the home sells for the tougher it gets for the builder to unload his remaining homes as this will have a negative mark on the comps in the area.

Good job 3495 PLEASANT VALE DRIVE.

Monday, October 02, 2006

Help! I've fallen and I can't get up


607 HILLSIDE WAY, SAN MARCOS, CA

This beautiful 3419 sq ft home with 5 Br and 4 Ba was purchased on 4/14/2005 for $785,000. A little over 16 months later (8/7/06) the seller decided to sell the home for $860,000.

I bet this seller told all her friends how easy it was to make a quick profit. I can just imagine:

"Yeah Julie, remember that house I bought last year? Yeah that one. I just put it on the market for about a 100K more that I paid for it. Oh ya it should go fast, there are so many idiots out there that think we are running out of homes."

Well, well, well...........not so fast. 55 days after listing this home this seller has dropped the price $185K to $675K. Looks like someone's 100% financed ARM is causing fits. No worries and take heart, you will not be the only one to suffer this fate for many already are lined up.

Are you next? I'm watching.

Sunday, October 01, 2006

Infested with Flippers in Chula Vista


1578 MOONBEAM LN, CHULA VISTA


This home was originally purchased on 10/28/2004 for $435,141. It was then flipped for $500,000 less the 6 months later on 2/16/05. It was flipped again 5 months after that for $560,000 on 7/22/2005.

The latest flipper orginally listed this home for sale for $630,000 on 4/24/2006. 160 days later the flipper has lowered his price to $530,000-$550,000. There's no more milk left here.

This is a great example of how these flippers attack the fabric of society and create a cycle of doom for families and hard-working Americans. You must not be their next victim: DO NOT BUY A HOME until the median price is San Diego County gets down to $350K.

Are you with me?

Short Sale in San Marcos


554 VIA DEL CABALLO, 2358 sq ft (Belleza Tract) built in 2004

Purchase price: $585,000 9/28/2004
Listing price: $590,000 8/16/2006 reduced to $540,000

Here is the exerpt from the realtor:

"SHORT SALE! LAST APPRAISAL $590, 000.00 subject to lenders approval, Huge master bedroom. minutes from the heart of San Marcos and Restaurant Row, walkingdistant to Cal-State San Marcos home in great condition. BRING YOUR OFFERS. ALL OF THEM WILL BE CONSIDERED. "

The flipper got screwed. The lender got screwed. The neighbors get screwed and society gets screwed because of senseless greed while the builder is laughing all the way to the bank.

October Review: Bay Park, 92110

Homes for sale: 158 listings

The Best Value:





2686 ILLION ST, SAN DIEGO, CA
Living Area: 1702 Sq Ft, 3BR, 3BA
Listing price : $569,000 (2178 sq ft lot)

Sale History:
09/04/2001: $353,000
04/08/1996: $189,500

Recent Comparables:



The Worst Value:




5053 SAVANNAH ST, SAN DIEGO, CA
Living Area: 150 Sq Ft, 3BR, 1BA (12500 sq ft lot)
Listing price : $925,000-$975,000

Sale History:
Not Available

Recent Comparables:


Flipo’meter:

This area is really not known as a prime flip area. It has many older homes and very few homes built after 2000. This is a great location that is close to the beach and downtown. However, many homes in this area are old and in bad shape so in general I would tend to pay between $200-250 sq ft for an average home.



Historical Median Price:

Median price 2000: $325K
Median price 2001: $379K
Median price 2002: $435K
Median price 2003: $522K
Median price 2004: $650K
Median price 2005: $650K
Median price 2006: $660K

I can't tell you what to do with your hard earned money, but I sure would think twice about buying anything in this area until the median price gets back to $350K-400K.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Home builders have a new trick to try to sell you a new home: They will help you get rid of your old one.

I was absolutely shocked as I was driving on the freeway today when I listened to a commercial from Shea Homes offering to sell you old home if you buy a new one from them. This type of strategy was unheard of a few years ago. I guess it’s a wake up call to all the flippers out there that spells doom. It’s amazing that with all their resources the builders are struggling to unload their new homes.

The next year should be very interesting.

Here is the link to the article: http://www.realestatejournal.com/buysell/markettrends/20060919-simon.html

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

COFI is only reason we have not seen a major crash


The 11th District Cost of Funds index (COFI) is one of the most popular ARM indexes. This index is primarily used for ARMs with monthly interest rate adjustments. Because this index generally reacts slowly in fluctuating markets, adjustments in your ARM interest rate will lag behind another market indicators. Many lenders believe COFI-indexed ARMs are some of the best deals available on the market today. The 11th District COFI is a 2-month lagging index: the index value for a particular month is not reported until the end of the next month.

From the graph it is quite obvious that the COFI is under performing at 4.2% which combined with a 1-2% margin will save alot of folks from foreclosure however, it is trending up as soon as it gets over 5.5-6% the major crash will commence.

The chart below compares other indices with the COFI, what a huge difference in rates and in my estimation enough difference to cause this "house of cards" to fall over.

Day of Reckoning; America’s Economic Meltdown

Interesting article, the link is available, however here are some interesting points:

"The magnitude of the housing bubble is shocking and unprecedented. According to the Federal Reserves own figures, “The total amount of residential housing wealth in the US just about doubled between 1999 and 2006 up from $10.4 trillion to $20.4 trillion.”(Times Online) This tells us that the Fed had a clear idea of the size of the equity balloon their low interest policies were creating, but decided not to take corrective action. It also tells us that there will be no “soft landing”. When the market begins to fall, no one knows when it will hit bottom. $10 trillion is more than a “little froth”, as Greenspan opined; it is an earth-shaking, economy-busting catastrophe that will put millions at risk of foreclosure, bankruptcy and ruin. "

“The housing market has turned; it’s going to be down this year and even more sharply next year,” said Dan Meckstroth, chief economist an Arlington, Virginia-based trade group. (Reuters) As the housing bubble deflates, economic growth will slump, and the anticipated recession will steadily deepen. "

Flipping Activity Report

This link from HomeSmartReports contains Home Flipping Statistics for 147 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA’s). Contained in these statistics are Q2 2006 results, 5-year flipping percentages, median price gainers and losers forQ2 2006 and percentages of those who lost money in the flipping process.

Interesting numbers for San Diego:


San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA:
% Flippers in last 5 years - 4.0%
% Flippers in 2006Q2 - 3.2% (profit of $48,250 on average)
% Flippers who lost money in 2006Q2 - 27.6% (loss of $37,250 on average)

-----------------------------------------------------
Seems a bit low?

Bob

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Flipper Gone Wild in Tierrasanta

10545 VIACHA WAY, TIERRASANTA, CA

This flipper purchased this 3 br, 3ba, 2400 sq ft home on a 7200 sq ft lot for $745,000 in May 2004. In which he seriously over-paid. He listed his home for sale in April 2006 for $999,000.

I am not the smartest person in the world but this home is nothing special, honestly it's pretty average, yet somehow within 24 months of purchasing this home this flipper believes its worth over $250K more than he paid for it.

OK.......Lets do the calculation $250k/(365x2 days)=$342/day.

Are you with me here folks because this is an amazing stat. This flipper believes you should give him $342 a day for cooking, sleeping, dumping, and showering in his home for 2 years. How stupid is that?

Well my friends that says it all......Who ever buys the p.o.s. from this flipper is unoffically the dumbest person alive.

Key Indicators to Examine When Measuring the Housing Slowdown

From The Wall Street Journal Online

With the housing market clearly sagging, economists and investors are watching a variety of gauges to get a handle on the severity of the contraction.

Last week, the Commerce Department reported that construction starts on new homes dropped 6% in August from July, to an annualized 1.665 million. That "housing starts" figure was about 5% lower than forecast and 20% lower than the year earlier 2.075 million. The month-over-month decline was the sixth one this year and put housing starts at the lowest level in more than three years.

The government estimates housing starts by surveying a sample of people who have applied for building permits. In places where permits aren't required, the process includes driving around looking for new-home construction.

Other gauges track new-home sales, existing-home sales, median house prices and the inventory of unsold homes.

New-home sales for August will be released by the Commerce Department Wednesday, and are expected to be down about 17% from a year ago. July's sales were down 21.6% from a year earlier, to an annualized 1.072 million homes sold.

New-home sales figures reflect market trends more quickly than do existing-home statistics. That's because new homes are counted as sold when the contract is signed, and existing homes are counted as sold only when the deal closes, which may be 30 to 60 days later.

Existing-home sales data, coming Monday from the National Association of Realtors, are expected to be down about 13% from August 2005. The annualized rate of 6.33 million existing homes sold in July represented an 11.2% decrease from last year.

The median sales price of existing homes, which is a good indicator of the market's momentum, was $230,000 in July, up 0.9% from the July 2005 price of $228,000, according to the Realtors group. That's smaller than the double-digit year-over-year gains posted in 2005.

Some parts of the country, including the Northeast, the Midwest and the West, are reporting falling home prices. The Realtors association has said the national median house price may fall in coming months, although any decline is expected to be limited. August numbers will be announced with the existing-home sales figures Monday.

Meanwhile, there's been a spike in the number of existing homes for sale. The Realtors group says 3.86 million homes were on the market last month, up from 2.76 million a year earlier. In addition to reflecting a diminished appetite on the part of buyers, that growing inventory may reflect the unwillingness of sellers to lower their asking prices enough to tempt buyers. With more houses for sale, buyers have less incentive to bid up prices, and home builders have fewer reasons to start construction on more units.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good article just don't pay attention to anything said by the Realtors association, they always caveat everything they say so they can talk out of both sides of their collective mouths.

Bob

Sellers Refuse to Accept Reality

Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Inman News

Home sales were down 30.1 percent in August compared to the same month last year, the California Association of Realtors trade group reported today, while the median existing-home price rose 1.6 percent to $576,360.

"We experienced the greatest year-to-year sales decline last month since August 1982, when sales fell 30.4 percent," said Vince Malta, C.A.R. president, in a statement. "This is another indication that we're in the initial stages of a long-anticipated adjustment in the market.
Some home sellers, he said, " are still clinging to price expectations that are no longer valid in today's market."

Closed escrow sales of existing single-family detached homes in California totaled 442,150 in August at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate, according to information collected by C.A.R. from about 90 local Realtor associations statewide.

The statewide sales figure represents what the total number of homes sold during 2006 would be if sales maintained the August pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales, the association reported.
The August 2006 median price increased 1.7 percent compared with July's revised $566,940 median price.

"Although the median price in the state and in several regions hit an all-time record in August, we expect softer prices toward the end of the year," stated Leslie Appleton-Young, C.A.R.'s vice president and chief economist.

"The median price typically peaks somewhere between June and August before declining toward the end of the year. Some areas of the state already have experienced year-to-year declines for more than two months. This is in stark contrast to the past several years when there were constant double-digit increases."

She also noted that 29 percent of homes are on the market for 30 days or less, compared with 51 percent a year ago, and the share of homes on the market for 90 days or longer has nearly quadrupled from 6 percent in August 2004 to 22 percent last month.

C.A.R.'s Unsold Inventory Index for existing, single-family detached homes in August 2006 was 6.8 months, compared with 2.6 months (revised) for the same period a year ago. The index indicates the number of months needed to deplete the supply of homes on the market at the current sales rate.

Monday, September 25, 2006

San Diego’s housing crisis – statistics and quotes

Interesting article from San Diego Housing Commission. They include many shocking and absurd stats:

Increasing housing prices vs. incomes in San Diego:

To afford a median-priced house ($550,000) today in San Diego, buyers need an annual income of about $134,000, assuming a 10 percent down payment and a 30-year fixed-rate financing at current interest rates. But according to the San Diego Association of Governments the county’s median household income is $64,273 – less than half of what is needed to afford a median-priced home here. (The Daily Transcript/MarketPointe Realty Advisors, 2/15/06)

The San Diego Association of Governments estimates that 172,000 local employees, or 13 percent of the work force, earn less than $8.35 an hour.

San Diego County’s high housing prices, coupled with its relatively low wages, make it the third least affordable major metropolitan area in the country. (National Association of Home Builders, 2006)

The median price for existing houses for December 2005 was $550,000(San Diego Union Tribune/Data Quick Information Systems, 1/22/06) – as compared to a national median price of $211,000. (National Association of Realtors, 2/28/06)

The average new detached home in San Diego County sells for $861,759 – a 350 percent increase over 1996 ($245,884). (The Daily Transcript/MarketPointe Realty 2/15/06)

Meanwhile, in the past six years the median household income in San Diego increased only 21 percent for a family of four. (San Diego Union Tribune, 7/10/05)

According to the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, in the past year, San Diego lost 15 percent of its manufacturing jobs (which are typically higher wage than retail and hospitality jobs). (San Diego Business Journal, 6/27/05)

According to the California Employment Development Department, some of the largest increases in employment over the past year have been in the leisure, hospitality and food service industry. And according to Center for Policy Initiatives, the median hourly wage of such service workers is $8.50. (The Daily Transcript, 2/15/06)

A 2006 report from America’s Second Harvest, a national organization of emergency food providers, found that 35 percent of its clients seeking aid must often choose between paying for food and rent. In addition, 42 percent reported having to choose between food and household utilities and 32 percent had to choose between food and medical costs.

With all these statistics how can anyone think there is no housing bubble?

Builders cater to their consumer base

My job takes me all over Southern California so I get to see how homes are priced from county to county. One thing that remains a mystery to me is how homes in areas of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties are priced higher than San Diego County.

It can’t be the location; God knows no one would want to live the torrid heat. It can’t be the job base, San Bernardino County has nothing but warehouses. It can be its easy access to LA, have you been on the 91, 60 or 10, forget about it. So what is it?

Well after much thought I have finally come to the conclusion that builders realize that San Diego consumers are better educated and will not succumb to excessively priced homes. Places like Corona, Colton, Redlands and Fontana have homes that are of the same size and quality for much more than homes in San Marcos, Escondido, Vista and Oceanside. That is not only ridiculous it is borderline criminal.

In San Bernardino and Riverside Counties builders have used shady lenders and shady lending practices to get buyers into homes that should be worth half of what you would pay in San Diego County. The builders and lenders should be ashamed of themselves for this unscrupulous behavior. Residents of these counties should know better than paying $800K for a home in Corona or Redlands and I don’t care how good the area you live in is.

October City Breakdown

In celebration of Halloween, starting 1 Oct, I will be breaking down most cities and unicorporated areas in San Diego County. We will look at the best and worst in many categories and assign ratings for just how much homes are overpriced in that city and determine the all important "flipper activity meter".

We will unmask the flippers!

Stay Tuned.......

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Exciting in Escondido




Escondido, 2004…….

Phil is a smart man, and wanted to show his wife just how smart he was. "Honey, I just bought a house in Escondido!" His wife was ecstatic, “So how much do you think we will make this time sweetie?” Phil replied, “Plenty, just watch and learn.”


Today,….

Well Phil I hate to break it you but you’re our next feature story on “This Old House Flip”. Yes, you made it here because of you’re tireless efforts to screw people of their hard earned money.

The Details

Phil purchased 1529 Hornbean Gln, Escondido, CA in the Summer of 2004 for $505k. Phil thought he would stick it out for 2 years to avoid paying the capital gains tax. Well, Phil you’re too late. Phil originally listed his home for $495K on 6/5/2006. Now he is entertaining offers between $459,900-$479,900. Good for you Phil you have impressed your wife by sticking to your guns. However, you have been on the market for over 3 months, its time to start chopping again.

Thanks for playing the flipping game

Are you next?

Top 5 Flips Gone Bad

Ladies and Gents,

I present to you the Top 5 Flips Gone Bad in San Diego County. With the way the market is currently behaving this will no doubt be a living document always ever-changing.



I know there are much more sellers in worse situations however, this list maps homes all over the county basically signifying the wide-spread “flips gone bad” scenario is not isolated to one community and that no flipper is safe.

Post your list, lets compare.

Friday, September 22, 2006

605 CARNATION CT Revisited

The owner of this home must be reading this blog. Almost a week after being featured on "This Old House Flip" the seller removed his range pricing of $729-764K and simply listed it for $755K.

Good move however, you will not sell this home for that price. Time is not on your side, the $563K you purchased the house for is only months away. If you don't believe me just ask your buddy at 5092 SEA MIST CT, SORRENTO VALLEY (This Old House Flip: Love Thy Neighbor?).

Love Thy Neighbor?

5175 SEA MIST COURT , SORRENTO VALLEY


Love thy neighbor? Well, only if he doesn't bring down the price of my home.

The neighbor at 5175 SEA MIST CT (1902 sq ft at $649-699K) is about to royally screw his buddy at 5092 SEA MIST CT. 5092 committed the ultimate no-no in July 2005 when he purchased his 1902 sq ft home for $795K.

Can you imagine the hate these neighbors must have for each other? The constant monitoring of price reductions, the anxiety, the sleepless nights …..ohhhhh the heart ache. Well that is what happens when you either flip a house or make someone rich trying at the wrong time in the market.

As far as I am concerned anyone who purchased a home after mid-2004 will eventually go through that hell, its just a matter of time.

The big difference here is that 5175 purchased his home for $500K and can afford to come down and still make a handsome profit while completely and utterly devastating his neighbor.

Lesson learned: If you live by the sword, not only will you die from it but you will have an agonizing death.

San Diego leading the way!

I must admit that America’s finest city is also America’s most sensible city. While home prices reached unpractical levels, especially in the condo arena, San Diego is coming to the realization that these prices are unsustainable and unwarranted, thus the record home inventory we see today. While still pricey, a home in San Diego County is much more bearable than Orange, Ventura and LA counties. Sellers in these counties have simply ignored the “birthing pains” of this inevitable bubble.

Many-a-days I sit down open up my laptop a scroll through many real estate sites and notice that San Diego sellers are chopping prices; $675K to $629K to $599K…etc. While the prices are still high, this signals a change in the mindset of the typical seller. Sellers in LA, Orange, and Ventura counties have yet to acknowledge this reality. They simply don’t get it! Record inventories, higher interest rates, higher gas prices and a recessive economy has made only a minor dent in the thick skulls of these myopic sellers. Homes in these counties that have been on the market for over 6 months have only seen minuscule price reductions.

I ask my fellow buyers in these counties to also hold off buying in these ridiculously overpriced areas. If you don't do this for yourselves, do it for your children and grandchildren who may never own a home if this ludicrous behavior is allowed to continue.

Remember this word to the wise: What’s the use of having a home if you’re never at home to enjoy it and spending all day at work trying to pay for it?

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Entertain This!

All of us in San Diego County have been subjected to those infamous words one time or another….”the seller is willing to entertain offers between” -- his get you in the door price and the actual price he is looking for. I remember when I was foolish enough to look for a home in 2004 in North County. I found a home in Rancho Bernardo that was selling between $499K-$569K. I put in a fair offer of $510K and the sellers were insulted that I came in on the low end and did not even counter. That was it for me! Renting was in my future. I refused to assimilate!

Times have changed…..Sellers now will accept anything within their range and will do so gladly. I ask you buyers to keep a stiff upper lip and not buy anything until the median home in SD county goes down to $350K. We must teach these greedy home wreckers a lesson in humility and in humanity. Buying a house shouldn’t be about making a profit it should be about making a family and a home. My generation has been stripped of that opportunity, but we will not wilt.

In conclusion, I ask you to entertain this, for our profit is living a simple and peaceful life.

Flip gone bad in Carlsbad

3475 MOON FIELD DR , CARLSBAD, CA


This flipper purchased this home June 2005 for $693,451. She listed it for sale in May 2006, less than a year after the purchase, for $779,475. Well, a mere 142 days after listing her home this flipper has reduced her price to $695,000-$715,000.

Even at $715K this flipper is at least $20K in the hole after realtor fees, taxes, and closing costs. But it will not be so easy to unload this home because of the HOAs/Mello-Roos fees of over $250 per month. I can understand paying this much for a condo, but for a $700K home that you barely qualified for is ludicrous.

I don’t think I will ever understand this flipper mentality, it goes without saying that this foolish risk taking will eventually catch up to you and bite you over and over again.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

605 CARNATION CT, SAN MARCOS, CA


Originally purchased in Jan 2005 for $563K this flipper believes that he is entitled to screw people of their hard-earned money because had the privilege of taking dumps in this house for the last 20 months.

With an asking price of $729,000 -$769,000 for the 2647 sq ft home, this flipper stands to make a cool $166K-$206K on the idiot that buys this over-inflated p.o.s.

Excuse my language but I am tired of seeing these flippers taking advantage of naive buyers who think the sky is falling. There is no reason this home is worth more than he paid for it. Honestly, he should be lucky to break even on this home.

....BREAKING NEWS........

The seller has reduced his asking price to $729,000 -$764,000. That should get the wagons circling the house. Lets see how much this one is reduced, I have a feeling it will go under $600K. 606 CARNATION (2517 sq ft) sold for $610K on Aug 2006.

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Best and Worst Deals

Lets look at the best and worst deals of the current marketplace. By best, I really mean best of the over-inflated market we live in. OK, lets not waste time: and the winners are:

For the worst deal in San Diego County:

552 GENTER ST. LA JOLLA, CA

For a mere $1,115,000-$1,200,000, you can have the priviledge of knocking down this 876 sq ft dingbat that currently stands on a 3500 sq ft lot. On the market now for 54 days, this beauty gives you the right to say "I live in La Jolla".

I can't imagine that in 30 years when the new owners of this beauty finally pay it off they can say say this home is worth over a million dollars. This is a real reverse mortgage.

For the best deal in San Diego County:

1818 NAVAJO PL ESCONDIDO, CA

In a relatively good area of Escondido, CA this 2051 sq ft home on 0.4 acre lot is priced at $374,000 and has been reduced from $399,000. On the market now for 8 days, this should get some attention.


House Flip Update

579 DUNDEE LANE, SAN MARCOS, CA

Current status is unknown, will do some digging.

1545 CRICKET DRIVE, CHULA VISTA, CA

16 days on the market and counting, looks like the seller should be contemplating a price reduction in a week or two.

2923 FARRAGUT RD, POINT LOMA, CA

53 days on the market and counting, the huge price range is a stupid idea, the seller needs to stick with a single price and negoitate from there.

Long Time Coming in San Marcos


617 BUSH LANE is the one of the first newer homes (built in 2006) in San Marcos, CA over 2100 sq ft to be priced under $500K. This is a big step in correcting a ridiculously over-inflated market in North San Diego County. This will no doubt cause a few sleepless night for nearby adjacent communities. At $499,900 and at 2120 sq ft of living space the price per sq ft yields approximately $235 sq ft. This does fall in my range of $200-250 sq ft in this area. It has been on the market for 4 days, lets see if this sells fast or labors in a exceeding tough buyers market.